Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 08:33

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
You sound like ChatGPT - The Verge
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Checkers Drop Game 1 of Finals in Double Overtime - Charlotte Checkers Hockey
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Cleveland issues public health alert after spike in COVID-19 detected in wastewater - Cleveland.com
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Is having white skin really that attractive?
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Can you describe what it's like to live in a town known for Harley Davidson motorcycles?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Who is the most dangerous or evilest person of all time?
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.